|
San Antonio Symphony
Fearless Prokofiev, jolly Shostakovich
March 13, 2010
The two musical giants of
Russia’s Soviet era, Serge Prokofiev and Dmitri Shotakovich, each has
his partisans and detractors. The San Antonio Symphony, in a model of
diplomatic tact, honored both with dazzling performances on March 12 in
the Majestic Theater.
Guest conductor Gregory Vajda led the concert, which culminated in a
fleet, precise account of Shostakovich’s Symphony No. 9. Pianist Andrew
Armstrong delivered astonishingly nimble, devil-may-care solo work in
Prokofiev’s Piano Concerto No. 1 -- and though that compact piece
contained more than enough notes to justify his fee, he followed it
(after intermission)with a burnished traversal of Robert Schumann’s
seldom-heard Introduction and Allegro Appassionato. The concert opened
with Mozart’s Symphony No. 38 in D, “Prague.”
Prokofiev’s concerto demands fearless speed and youthful insouciance in
the athletic outer allegros, and mature poetry in the rhapsodic slow
movement. Armstrong complied on all counts. His biting rhythms were
right on target in the allegros. At one point in the finale, where the
solo line bounces wildly across the keyboard, Armstrong pushed the
tempo so hard that the music almost careened out of control -- which is
the point, actually. For flat-out excitement, this performance could
hardly be bettered.
Schumann’s Introduction and Allegro Appassionata also calls
for some fancy fingerwork, but the piano part is more a part of the
orchestral texture than a vehicle for solo display. Armstrong’s
fluidity and elegant touch served the music admirably.
In Shostakovich, Vajda impressed
with his sense of the long line and his excellent tempo choices. The
quick movements were uncommonly jolly, the slow ones patient and
thoughtful. He had the good sense not to conduct the ruminative bassoon
solo in the largo but just let principal bassoonist Sharon Kuster play
it, which she did to stunning effect. Also notable were juicy
solos by Julie Luker on piccolo, Ilya Shterenberg on clarinet, John
Carroll on trumpet and Ertan Torgul on violin.
Vajda’s sense of line acquitted him well in Mozart, as well, although
his lush balances and cushy articulation might not be to everyones
taste.
One shouldn’t be dogmatic on the matter of articulation in Mozart,
partly because the staccato markings in his autograph scores are
sometimes ambiguous. To take one example from the second movement of
the “Prague” Symphony, the strings have a recurring five-note motive
that the old Bretkopf and Härtel edition renders with a staccato
dot over the first four notes; the New Mozart Edition, making a choice
among varying sources, places a staccato dot over only the three middle
notes. (From the sound of it, that would seem to be edition used for
this concert.) Too, there is often room for debate about how detached
Mozart wanted staccato notes to be. In the case of that five-note
motive, Vajda favored minimal detachment; other conductors prefer
crisper definition, and I would side with them.
Who’s right? Too bad Mozart didn’t take an orchestra into his friendly
neighborhood Deutsche Grammophon studio to settle the
matter.
Mike
Greenberg
|
|