|
|
|
|
Original city limits? Not so fast
February 2, 2014
San Antonio Cultural Geography in a nutshell:
Civilization is to be found in the 36 square miles of “the
original city limits” -- a perfect square, six miles on a
side, with the dome of San Fernando Cathedral at the
center. Stray outside The 36, and you are likely to be
devoured by naked, ululating savages.
Even San Antonians who are not explicitly familiar with
The 36 nonetheless recognize its status implicitly when
they refer to the cultural wilderness “North of
Hildebrand,” the arterial street that lies just inside the
northern boundary of The 36.
The 36 has official cachet. On its web site, the city’s
Office of Historic Preservation informs us that it has
conducted a survey of historic resources. “The survey area
covers the original city limits as defined in 1856 and
encompasses a land area of 36 square miles."
|
|
Three
versions of San Antonio's
historical city
limits. Click image for a larger view.
|
But this “original city limits”
business is complicated. Old maps show two
other boundaries, both pre-dating The 36. One area is
much smaller, the other much larger, taking in all of
the presnt city of Olmos Park, a portion of Alamo
Heights, and even a short stretch of Loop 410, way north
of Hildebrand.
Both of those earlier boundaries
appear on a map, titled “Plat of the City Tract of San
Antonio de Bexar.” The map was drawn by Jore
Gentilz “from field notes furnished me by Francis Giraud
in 1852, by which map the city lots were sold” Francois
(the usual spelling) Giraud was an architect and, from
1849 to 1853, the city engineer of San Antonio. He would
serve as mayor from 1872 to 1875.
The City Tract (called the Town Tract on later maps) was
based on a survey conducted by John James Feb. 1-11,
1846, soon after the annexation of Texas by the United
States on Dec. 29, 1845. William Corner’s “San
Antonio de Bexar: a guide and history,” published in
1890, explains the origin and importance of that survey:
"The original City Grant from the King of Spain having
been lost in the troublous revolutionary days, the city
found it advisable to sue out its title.... Then
followed the celebrated suit of the City versus Nat
Lewis, senior, in which the City sues Nat Lewis and
others for certain lands specified to be within the
confines of the Original royal Grant to the people and
inhabitants of the town of “San Fernando” (San Antonio).
The Lower Courts first decided and established the
boundaries of the Original Grant to the city (John
James, Sr., surveying the same) and gave judgment for
the city. The Supreme Court [of the Republic of Texas]
affirmed the decision, and upon this rests the title to
all lands situated within the 'Town Tract,' as it is now
called."
|
|
|
A footnote in
Corner’s book reproduces James’s field notes, which
make fascinating reading: “Beginning at an
old stone dam on the Concepcion ditch from the southeast
corner of which a pecan 30 in. in diameter bears south 27°
west, 7 1/4 varas, this place being pointed out to me as
the presita of the Concepcion ditch, by Rafael Herrera and
Manuel Cadena. Thence north 83° east, 6800 varas to a
pecan tree 10 in. in diameter, on the west bank of the
Salado Creek....”
The Town Tract was a very irregular
polygon with its northern vertex near the present-day
intersection of Vance-Jackson and Jackson-Keller Roads,
a short distance outside of Loop 410; the southern tip
was well to the south of the present Port San Antonio
(formerly Kelly Air Force Base). Much of the Town Tract
boundary survives into the present as busy arterial
streets -- Jackson-Keller Road, Hillcrest, Acme Road,
Nogalitos and its extension as Somerset Road, and
Aransas Street.
|
1852 map of the
City Tract, later called the Town Tract, ostensibly
reconstructed the original Spanish land grant. Click
image for a larger view.
|
Detail
of a Bexar County property map from 1879 shows the Town
Tract but not the 36-square mile city limits defined in
1856. Click image for larger view.
|
A Bexar County property
map of 1879 shows the Town Tract, but not The 36, the city
limit officially established in 1856. A Bexar County map
of 1887 shows both boundaries, with The 36 drawn in
thicker lines and evidently taking precedence.
But go back to that Giraud-Gentilz map of 1852 in
which the Town Tract first appears. That map also shows a
rectangular boundary, the northern leg of which coincides
with the present Grayson Street and falls a little south
of the present San Pedro Springs Park. The southern leg
almost coincides with one leg of the Town Tract boundary
between the Paso Nogalitos (where Nogalitos Street meets
San Pedro Creek) and that pecan tree on the Concepcion
ditch, roughly where the present Roosevelt Avenue meets
the railroad tracks.
A portion of the eastern side of this
rectangle is identified as the “Old 2 League Grant Line”
on a map that appears in an 1894 ruling by the Texas
Court of Civil Appeals. (The details of the lawsuit will
put you to sleep, so I’ll not repeat them here.) The map
also shows the “Present City Limit Line” (as designated in
1856) less than half a mile farther east. |
|
|
To make a long story short, by the
1850s the Old 2 League Grant Line was “always well
known, and established on the ground,” according to the
court. The city commissioned the Giraud map of the Town
Tract to gain or regain control over a much larger swath
of territory that, ostensibly, comprised the original
Spanish land grant.
The 36-square mile boundary of
1856 apparently has no basis in the city’s Spanish
or Mexican history but was a Yankee interloper --
an artifact of the Public Land Survey System established
by the Continental Congress of the United States. Under
that system, townships were generally surveyed as
squares, six miles on each side, and oriented so that
their boundaries ran north-south and east-west.
What is not clear to me is why the city adopted the
36-mile boundary so soon after designating the much
larger Town Tract boundary of 1852. Texas continued to
recognize Spanish land grants after statehood, in a
hybrid system that also used the national survey scheme.
At any rate, it seems to me that
the city ought to pay respect to both of the earlier
boundaries, but especially to the Town Tract, which has
the deepest historical roots and which continues to
leave traces on the street map into the present.
Mike Greenberg
|
Map
in an 1894 court case shows portion of "Old 2 League Grant
Line" in relation to "Present City Limit Line" of 1856.
|